wiseheart: (Macika)
[personal profile] wiseheart
Hi folks! *waves*

Time is flying by, isn't it? It's that time of a year again - I'm getting older. In this case, I'm turning 55 on October 9, which used to be an important thing, back under the old regime. Women could retire at the age of 55 back then. So I've decided to ignore all that fantastic headway we've supposedly made towards democracy in the last two decades and enter my virtual retirement, blithley overlooking the fact that I'll have to work another 7 or 8 or only God knows how many years.

So, let's party! Last years virtual birthday party yielded 742 comments on 6 pages, which won't be easy to top, but we're good, aren't we? WE CAN DO IT! So, let's give it a try! In the recent years, it has always been great fun, so let's have fun again!

You're all cordially invited to help yourself to a slice of virtual Dobos Cake recipe - it's my absolute favourite, although I never managed to get it as good as my Garnny used to.

Cheers!

Note: The party will be closed on October 9, at midnight, sharp. Join us and have fun!

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-06 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wiseheart.livejournal.com
Perhaps. He'd be still great.
What's this with this youth-craziness in TV anyway? You can't see a decent character beyond 20 anymore.

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-06 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenn-calaelen.livejournal.com
It appears to be because according to the people making the programs young people won't watch tv unless they find the leads attractive and obviously old people can't be attractive! The whole thing is totally crazy, but appears to be why the doctor is getting younger and younger, as well as why all the companions are young (and at least one is female)
It seems to be part of the whole idea that all tv (films etc) has to appeal to teenagers and 20s people - so why everything has to have sex and violence and lack of intellectual depth. Except things that are put into different niches - but that mostly seems to be not-fiction stuff.
(sorry for ranting - tv annoys me so much)

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-07 04:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wiseheart.livejournal.com
Oh, I completely agree with you. I like me some more mature characters, even in sci-fi. *points at icon*

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-07 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenn-calaelen.livejournal.com
I do too - I get very tired of the fact that it appears that most people in tv shows are far too young for the qualifications and experience that they are supposed to have. Not that I mind occasional geniuses especially where it actually makes sense (eg Charlie Eppes in Numb3rs) and where they consider the impact that this will have had on the characters and those around them.

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-07 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wiseheart.livejournal.com
"Stargate: Universe" comes to the mind...
Although in that one, the older charcters were every bit as stupid and amoral as the younger ones.

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-07 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenn-calaelen.livejournal.com
I still haven't seen it - all that I've heard makes me very reluctant to spend any money to see if, but eventually I'll probably see it, and my expectations of it are very low.

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-07 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wiseheart.livejournal.com
Save your money and wait until it comes to free TV. It's really not worth it.

Re: Sid for Doctor

Date: 2011-10-06 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
It does make for some pretty television, but I'd like some variety.
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 03:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios