Virtual Birthday Party, Day 2
Oct. 2nd, 2013 11:13 pmDear all,
Day 1 of the party has been a great success: 170 comments on 2 pages so far. As agreed, I hereby kick off the second day, so that we won't lose everything like last year, should LJ crash our party again.
Threads of interest can still be commented on, but I ask you to start any new threads here from now on
And now: on with the party!!!
Day 1 of the party has been a great success: 170 comments on 2 pages so far. As agreed, I hereby kick off the second day, so that we won't lose everything like last year, should LJ crash our party again.
Threads of interest can still be commented on, but I ask you to start any new threads here from now on
And now: on with the party!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-04 11:18 pm (UTC)Not to mention the recent Jane Eyre film with Mia Wasikowska. I don't think any film/tv version of the novel has entirely worked for me, and it did have one or two good points, but oh god the lack of chemistry between Jane & Rochester was just sad. And the casting has meant that the formerly-bijou-but-high-quality JE fandom is being overrun with Rochester/some character from the Austen biopic. I hate hate hate it when actor pairings acquire such a following that the characters from all their films get paired willy-nilly.
Oh, and the new Sherlock Holmes films with Robert Downey, Jr. We bought the DVD of the first film & turned it off in disgust by mutual agreement after the first 20 minutes. I've never seen anything to beat the old Granada television version with Jeremy Brett.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-05 01:42 am (UTC)I haven't seen the most recent version of Jane Eyre yet, but you are right - the chemistry between Jane & Rochester is essential, if it's not there, than what's the point.
I can't stand the new Sherlock Holmes films either - I really wanted to like them, but it's just not right. I loved the old Granada version with Jeremy Brett.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-05 02:16 am (UTC)The new Jane Eyre had far more chemistry between Jane & Rivers (an excellent Jamie Bell); in fact, the whole Rivers section was foregrounded. It made for an interesting AU, but it really wasn't Jane Eyre.
And I don't understand what they were aiming for with the new Sherlock Holmes. It seemed to turn Holmes into generic action hero -- I can see there are elements of physicality in the original that it's fair to foreground, but I like the disembodied brain archetype & there are plenty of other action heroes around.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-05 04:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-05 08:24 pm (UTC)One of the things I thought when I first saw the Sherlock pilot was that they missed a trick in not making Watson female. (But then I got to like Freeman in the role very much.) It was a shame with Sherlock that they didn't present any positive women, other than as very minor characters, until they decided to develop Molly into that niche.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-05 08:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-06 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-10-06 08:03 am (UTC)