wiseheart: (Default)
[personal profile] wiseheart
I've posted my new essay to Otherworlds. It's not a well-rounded one, but something I've wanted to get off my chest for quite some time. It'll become the introduction to the prequel of my Ages-old Boromir series... eventually.

The last part of the holiday report will come, too, in time. Sorry for the delay.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-03 02:43 pm (UTC)
makamu: (favourite Tolkien quote (by brouhaha))
From: [personal profile] makamu
I have read your essay and I think it has many well-worked out arguments. I will think up a coherent and logical response later but for now, let me say, that there were quite a few points where I was going "Exactly!" but also some where I was going "But, but he didn't..." You can guess them, I think ;).

Nice to hear the anylytical side of your Tolkien muse is still alive, though :) *hugs*

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-03 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brinian.livejournal.com
Yes, I do agree with much of this! In fact, I see some of your excellent reasoning reflected in the views of Isabeau's OC, Andrahar (whom I adore!). The time in which JRRT was working was one in which less precision was expected and accepted. Tolkein was not writing with all the resources we now have available. He was working with hardcopy - and manuscript hardcopy at that - and memory as his primary sources. We have the luxury of internet, hundreds of people to bounce our ideas off of, printed and easily accessible texts of his works, and the concept of 'canon' from which to work. I think in his mind, the world was more fluid than it is in ours. I also think that in his mind LOTR was less a book and more legend that he was setting down for future generations. If you reread the preface to LOTR, he comes across as somewhat bemused at how seriously people take the whole thing.

Tolkein didn't spend much time (if ANY) psychoanalizing the characters, worrying about whether or not Aragorn was violating principles of good leadership, or debating whether Finduilas died as a result of DV or from cancer, but rather he was concerned about moving his narrative forward. Boromir had to die in order for the company to split and force Frodo to go to Mordor alone with Sam. Finduilas had to die because she couldn't be present to be a grounding point in Denethor's life at the time of the Ring War. The Palantir had to be in use to drive Denethor to madness so that he would not live to foster a civil war at the start of Aragorn's reign (the same could be said of Boromir's death). It's a plot device, not a character flaw. I always thought Boromir got shafted.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-07-04 09:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jilba.livejournal.com
Cyberspace ate my reply at Otherworlds.*sulks*

But I enjoyed the essay, and agree throughly with you on all of it.
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 09:17 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios