So, it is party time again, folks!

[wiseheart]

Each year this time, we launch my virtual birthday party, which starts on October 1 and ends on October 9 at midnight, sharp. The goals of the party are to post as many comments and collapse as many threads as possible, on as many new pages as we can. It is always great fun, as you can see if you check out the similar entries of the last few years.

This year, I'll also throw the real party at mid-time - and post the recipes of all the food that will be there for you, so that you can all participate if you want to. Virtual food has no calories.

Fandom-related discussions are as welcome as the ones about coffee or chocolate (just to name a few favourites from previous years), and, of course, pictures and recipes of birthday cakes. ;)

So, drop by, tell your story, post your pics or silly poems, ask questions you always wanted to ask and have a good time!

Soledad, in excited expectation




Oh, and by the way, to provide birthday gifts hobbit-style, I've got a revived story and a Kansas 2 update for you.

Enjoy!

Comments

[espresso-addict.livejournal.com]

I find with films that are novel adaptations my degree of dislike of the film depends on whether I read the novel first or later. I'm much more capable of tolerating divergence when I read the novel only afterwards.

[solanpolarn.livejournal.com]

I also find myself much more able to tolerate differences, when I saw the film first. However, in most of those cases I still think that the book is better, and so much better that it is noticeable. Here, I love both and perhaps because they are different enough find that I don't actually have a marked preference.

[espresso-addict.livejournal.com]

I think the only time I've loved the film more than the book is Howl's Moving Castle, where Miyazaki's film has a much darker take on the universe than the Diana Wynne Jones original -- but in that case I saw the film first. They are so different it would be easy to consider them different takes on a similar idea that happened to use the same names.

Though there are some adaptations that provide wonderful eye candy for the heterosexual female/gay male -- Maurice and the television version of Brideshead Revisited spring to mind.

[solanpolarn.livejournal.com]

I did love the film Howl's Moving Castle, from the first time I saw it. There were bits that only made sense much later when I read the book though. I agree they two stories are very different, and I am inclined to indeed think of them as two very separate entities. I like the book better though, mostly because of my love of the Sophie in it.

I haven't seen Maurice, but I do indeed remember there being quite a bit of eye candy in Brideshead Revisited!

[espresso-addict.livejournal.com]

Sophie is a wonderful character in both book and film. Have you read the sequels (I have yet to)?

What's your favourite Diana Wynne Jones? Mine is probably Power of Three though I love Eight Days of Luke and find the Dalemark universe fascinating. I haven't read a lot of her later books -- I grew too old for them as a child, and have only learned recently to return to children's lit.

If you liked Brideshead Revisited, Maurice is definitely worth a try. It has an early Hugh Grant, before he stopped acting and his looks went off, plus a very early Rupert Graves. And there's the most candid m/m sex scene I can recall from films of that era.